This House of Grief

this-house-of-grief

This house of grief – Helen Garner

About the Book

Anyone can see the place where the children died. You take the Princes Highway past Geelong, and keep going west in the direction of Colac. Late in August 2006, soon after I had watched a magistrate commit Robert Farquharson to stand trial before a jury on three charges of murder, I headed out that way on a Sunday morning, across the great volcanic plain. On the evening of 4 September 2005, Father’s Day, Robert Farquharson, a separated husband, was driving his three sons home to their mother, Cindy, when his car left the road and plunged into a dam. The boys, aged ten, seven and two, drowned. Was this an act of revenge or a tragic accident? The court case became Helen Garner‘s obsession. She followed it on its protracted course until the final verdict. In this utterly compelling book, Helen Garner tells the story of a man and his broken life. She presents the theatre of the courtroom with its actors and audience, all gathered for the purpose of bearing witness to the truth, players in the extraordinary and unpredictable drama of the quest for justice. This House of Grief is a heartbreaking and unputdownable book by one of Australia’s most admired writers.

Comments

Too much detail- became tedious. Found the book too long and often boring in the detail.

Occasionally skimmed details of accident. Wonderful observations of people. Scenes from the courtroom became tedious towards the end.

Really liked the way Garner disected the characters. At times felt sorry for FarquharsonHe felt his world had spun out of control. Highlighted court cases can be very cruel. Garner writes this type of novel extremely well.

Really like Helen Garner’s writing, but this topic was too confronting to really like the book.

Can’t make my mind up about this novel. On balance I think that Farquharson was guilty but there are doubts e.g. cough syncope. Became irritable by the book e.g. disparaging comments about men. I think that Helen Garner felt he was guilty from the beginning and she was biased in reporting the evidence against him.

Read by – The First Wednesday Book Group